Vaccines Treatment Options in Maryland

Multicenter, randomized, single-blinded comparison of two formulations of the rF1V vaccine at a single dosage of 80 µg and two 3-dose schedules in 400 healthy, adult volunteers in four parallel cohorts. Two rF1V vaccine cohorts (N=160 each) and two rF1V antigen-only cohorts (N=40 each) will be vaccinated at two different three-dose schedules (Days 0, 56 and 182 or Days 0, 56 and 121). Read Less

This is a randomized, un-blinded, Phase II study in males and non-pregnant females, who are in good health, 19 to 64 years of age. This study is designed to assess the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of a pre-pandemic AS03 (GSK) adjuvanted 2017 monovalent inactivated influenza A/H7N9 vaccine, when two doses are administered 21 days apart either sequentially or simultaneously (within 15 minutes) with licensed seasonal influenza vaccine. Subjects will be randomized into one of three treatment groups. The study will enroll approximately 150 individuals who have no history of influenza A/H7N9 infection or prior receipt of an influenza virus H7 subtype vaccine. Study duration is approximately 16 months with subject participation duration of approximately 13 months. The primary objectives of this study are: 1) to assess the safety and reactogenicity following sequential or simultaneous IM administration of 2 doses of AS03-adjuvanted 2017 H7N9 IIV and one dose of seasonal influenza vaccine (IIV4); 2) to assess the serum HAI and Neut antibody responses against A/H7N9 at approximately 21 days following receipt of two doses of AS03-adjuvanted 2017 H7N9 IIV administered IM approximately 21 days apart; 3) to assess the serum HAI and Neut antibody responses against the seasonal influenza strains at approximately 21 days following receipt of IIV4. Read Less

The main purpose of this study is to assess the ability of H5 influenza virus vaccines and adjuvants present in the National Pre-Pandemic Influenza Vaccine Stockpile (NPIVS) to generate an immune response to homologous and to antigenically distant heterologous H5 influenza virus strains. The study is designed to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of vaccination strategies with homologous or antigenically distant heterologous H5 influenza virus vaccines administered with AS03 or MF59 adjuvant. Read Less

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of GSK Biologicals' vaccine GSK1557484A against pandemic avian (H5N1) influenza in adults at occupational risk of exposure to the virus. Read Less

This study will enroll patients who have metastatic pancreatic cancer with stable disease on FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. The main purpose of this study is to compare survival between patients that receive ipilimumab and a pancreatic tumor vaccine and patients who continue to receive FOLFIRINOX. Funding Source - FDA Office of Orphan Product Development (OOPD) Read Less

RATIONALE: Vaccines made from peptides may help the body build an effective immune response to kill tumor cells that express HER2/neu. Biological therapies, such as GM-CSF, may stimulate the immune system in different ways and stop tumor cells from growing. It is not yet known whether vaccine therapy is more effective than GM-CSF in treating breast cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase II trial is studying vaccine therapy to see how well it works compared with GM-CSF in treating patients with breast cancer. Read Less

Research Hypothesis: Ipilimumab (an antibody that blocks negative signals to T cells) administered alone or in combination with a pancreatic cancer vaccine (allogeneic pancreatic tumor cells transfected with a GM-CSF gene), has an acceptable safety profile in subjects with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Primary Objective: To determine the safety profile of ipilimumab alone or in combination with a pancreatic cancer vaccine in subjects with locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Secondary Objectives: * To estimate overall survival (OS) which will serve as the primary efficacy signal. * To explore an association of T cell responses and immunological responses with OS in patients receiving treatment. * To estimate overall response rate (ORR), immune related best overall response rate (irBOR), progression free survival (PFS), and duration of response in patients receiving treatment. * To explore an association between immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) and ORR. * To measure tumor marker kinetics (CA 19-9) in patients receiving treatment. Read Less

RATIONALE: Vaccines made from gene-modified tumor cells may help the body build an immune response to kill tumor cells. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cyclophosphamide, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab, can block tumor growth in different ways. Some block the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Others find tumor cells and help kill them or carry tumor-killing substances to them. Cetuximab may also stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. Giving vaccine therapy together with cyclophosphamide and cetuximab may kill more tumor cells. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well vaccine therapy works when given together with cyclophosphamide and cetuximab in treating patients with metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Read Less

This study is a Phase 1, escalating, multiple-dose, single-center study to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the RVEc vaccine. The two principal hypotheses to be tested are: RVEc vaccine will display an acceptable safety profile as determined by adverse event data and RVEc vaccine will elicit ELISA immunoglobulin G (IgG) titers greater than or equal to 1:500 and toxin-neutralizing antibody (TNA) anti-ricin toxin-neutralizing antibody titers greater than or equal to 1:50 in vaccine recipients. Read Less

This study seeks to determine the safety and immunogenicity of a series of 3 primary vaccinations and a booster vaccination of Recombinant ricin toxin A-chain 1-33/44-198 (rRTA 1-33/44-198) vaccine (RVEc) at 10, 50, or 75 μg IM. This study is evaluating if RVEc will display an acceptable safety profile as determined by adverse event (AE) data and if RVEc will elicit anti-ricin antibody titers and ricin toxin-neutralizing antibodies in vaccine recipients. Read Less

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of Q Fever Vaccine, Phase I, Inactivated, Dried, NDBR 105 and collect data on incidence of occupational Q fever infection in vaccinated personnel. Read Less

This study seeks to determine the safety and immunogenicity of a series of 3 primary vaccinations and a booster vaccination of Recombinant ricin toxin A-chain 1-33/44-198 (rRTA 1-33/44-198) vaccine (RVEc) at 10 or 20 μg intradermally (ID). This study is evaluating if RVEc will display an acceptable safety profile as determined by adverse event (AE) data and if RVEc will elicit anti-ricin antibody titers and ricin toxin-neutralizing antibodies in vaccine recipients. Read Less