Dexamethasone Treatment Options in Gilbert, AZ

The purpose of this study is to determine the Recommended Phase 2 Dose and clinical benefit of elranatamab in combination with other anti-cancer therapies in participants with multiple myeloma. Read Less

Phase 1b, open-label study evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, preliminary antitumor activity, and pharmacodynamics of OPN-6602 monotherapy and in combination with dexamethasone in subjects with relapsed and/or refractory MM. Read Less

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy (rate of very good partial response \[VGPR\] or better as best response as defined by the International Myeloma Working Group \[IMWG\] criteria) of daratumumab subcutaneous (Dara-SC) in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) with the efficacy of Kd in participants with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma who were previously exposed to daratumumab to evaluate daratumumab retreatment. Read Less

The goal of this study (iMMagine-3) is to compare the study drug, anitocabtagene autoleucel to standard of care therapy (SOCT) in participants with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who have received 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy, including an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody and an immunomodulatory drug. The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of anitocabtagene autoleucel versus SOCT in participants with RRMM as measured by progression-free survival (PFS) per blinded independent review committee (IRC). Read Less

This is a multicenter, open-label, phase I/II clinical study, to assess the safety, tolerability, antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of EOS884448 (also known as EOS-448 or GSK4428859A), alone or in combination with iberdomide with and without dexamethasone in participants with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Read Less

This study will independently assess the efficacy and safety of 11 combination therapies in 12 arms, in dose-escalation/-evaluation and expansion phases, for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). The combinations to be evaluated are: * Arm 1: Selinexor + dexamethasone + pomalidomide (SPd); enrollment complete * Arm 2: Selinexor + dexamethasone + bortezomib (SVd); enrollment complete * Arm 3: Selinexor + dexamethasone + lenalidomide (SRd) in RRMM; enrollment complete * Arm 4: Selinexor + dexamethasone + pomalidomide + bortezomib (SPVd); enrollment complete * Arm 5: Selinexor + dexamethasone + daratumumab (SDd); enrollment complete * Arm 6: Selinexor + dexamethasone + carfilzomib (SKd); enrollment complete * Arm 7: Selinexor + dexamethasone + lenalidomide (SRd) in NDMM; enrollment complete * Arm 8: Selinexor + dexamethasone + ixazomib (SNd); enrollment complete * Arm 9: Selinexor + dexamethasone + pomalidomide + elotuzumab (SPEd); enrollment complete * Arm 10: Selinexor + dexamethasone + belantamab mafodotin (SBd); enrollment complete * Arm 11: Selinexor + dexamethasone + pomalidomide + daratumumab (SDPd); enrollment complete * Arm 12: Selinexor + dexamethasone + mezigdomide (SMd); actively recruiting Selinexor pharmacokinetics: * PK Run-in (Days 1-14): Starting in protocol version 8.0, patients enrolled to any arm in the Dose Escalation Phase (i.e., Arm 4 \[SPVd\], Arm 6 \[SKd\], Arm 8 \[SNd\], Arm 9 \[SPEd\], Arm 10 \[SBd\], and Arm 11 \[SDPd\]) will also first be enrolled to a pharmacokinetics (PK) Run-in period until 9 patients have been enrolled to this period to evaluate the PK of selinexor before and after co-administration with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. This run-in period does not apply to Arm 12 (SMd). Read Less

This study will be separated into 3 distinct phases designated as the Phase 1 study, Phase 2 pivotal study (Cohort 1 and Cohort 2), and Phase 2 safety management study (Cohort 3 and Cohort 4, Cohort 5 and Cohort 6). The primary objectives of this study are: * Phase 1 Study: Evaluate the safety of axicabtagene ciloleucel regimens * Phase 2 Pivotal Study; Evaluate the efficacy of axicabtagene ciloleucel * Phase 2 Safety Management Study: Assess the impact of prophylactic regimens or earlier interventions on the rate and severity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic toxicities Subjects who received an infusion of KTE-C19 will complete the remainder of the 15 year follow-up assessments in a separate long-term follow-up study, KT-US-982-5968. Read Less

Primary Objectives: * To evaluate the safety and tolerability of isatuximab administered subcutaneously (SC) versus intravenously (IV) * To assess the safety and tolerability (including local injection site tolerability) of isatuximab using the (investigational) isatuximab injector device * To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of SC and IV isatuximab Secondary Objectives: * To estimate absolute bioavailability of SC and IV isatuximab * To measure receptor occupancy (RO) after isatuximab SC versus IV administration * To assess efficacy of isatuximab after SC and IV administration * To assess patient expectations prior to and patient experience and satisfaction after SC administration * To evaluate potential immunogenicity of SC or IV isatuximab Read Less

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of first-line treatment with everolimus plus letrozole in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Moreover, the study also aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of second line treatment with everolumus plus examestane in participants whose disease progressed during everolimus plus letrozole therapy. Read Less

The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability of rovalpituzumab tesirine in subjects with specific delta-like protein 3-expressing advanced solid tumors. Read Less

This study is designed to compare the treatment effect of PEGPH20 combined with nab-paclitaxel (NAB) and gemcitabine (GEM) \[PAG\] to NAB and GEM \[AG\] in participants with Stage IV previously untreated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). The study will have 2 run-in phases, one for each formulation of PEGPH20 (original and new formulations), and a Phase 2 portion. The 2 run-in phases will evaluate the safety and tolerability of the PAG treatment using the original and new succinic acid PEGPH20 formulation, respectively, compared with AG treatment. Phase 2 will have 2 stages due to a partial clinical hold that occurred from April through July 2014. The participants will be randomized in 3:1 for the run-in phases. The first stage will randomize participants in a 1:1 ratio. The second stage will randomize participants in a 2:1 ratio (PAG:AG). This is an open-label study. To minimize bias to the progression-free survival endpoint, disease progression will be based on the assessment of the Central Imaging Reader (CIR). Determination of clinical progression by the Investigator without corresponding CIR confirmation will be documented with the relevant signs and symptoms. Read Less