Vaccines Treatment Options in San Diego, CA

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the non-inferior HAI immune response of quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV4) vs licensed Egg-Based Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (IIV4) for the 4 strains based on the egg-derived antigen in all participants aged 3 to 8 years and to describe the immunogenicity and safety profile of RIV4 compared to IIV4 in participants aged 3 to 8 years. Read Less

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the immunogenicity, safety, and reactogenicity of mRNA-1083 as compared with active control, co-administered licensed influenza and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV 2) vaccines, in 2 independent age-group sub-study cohorts, healthy adults 65 years and older (Cohort A) and healthy adults 50 to \<65 years of age (Cohort B). Read Less

Phase 2, Randomized, Active-Controlled, Observer-Blinded, Multicenter Trial of the Immunogenicity, Safety, and Tolerability of rF1V Vaccine with CpG 1018® Adjuvant Compared with rF1V Vaccine in Adults 18 to 55 Years of Age Read Less

This study was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of a single dose of V114 when administered concomitantly and non-concomitantly (i.e., 30 days after) with influenza vaccine. It also evaluated whether V114 can be administered concomitantly with influenza vaccine without impairing the antibody response to the 15 serotypes contained in V114 and to the 4 influenza viruses contained in the seasonal inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV). The primary hypotheses state that immune responses to V114 and to QIV are non-inferior when administered concomitantly as compared with non-concomitant administration as measured by serotype-specific opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) and hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) geometric mean titers (GMTs) at 30 days postvaccination. This study will also contribute to the overall safety database and immunogenicity data for V114 to support initial licensure in adults. Read Less

The primary objectives of the study were: * To assess the safety profile of each dose of the study product after each and any administration in all infants and toddlers regardless of baseline serostatus. * To characterize the Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) A serum neutralizing antibody responses to the study product in each vaccine group after vaccination in RSV-naïve participants. The secondary objectives of the study were: * To quantify the amount of vaccine virus shed by each participant by baseline serostatus. * To determine the proportion of vaccinated infants and toddlers in each vaccine group infected with the vaccine virus at D56 (56 days after vaccination 1) for Cohorts 1, 2, 3 and 4, and at Day 84 (28 days after vaccination 2) for Cohorts 2 and 4 by baseline serostatus. * To characterize the RSV A serum neutralizing antibody responses to the study product in each vaccine group after vaccination in RSV-experienced participants. * To characterize serum RSV anti-F immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody responses to the study product in each vaccine group after vaccination by baseline serostatus. * To characterize serum RSV antibody responses (RSV A-neutralizing and anti-RSV F IgG) to the study product in each vaccine group after the RSV surveillance season or at least 5 months after the last vaccine administration by baseline serostatus. Read Less

Brief Summary of Stage 1: The purpose Stage 1 (Phase I/IIa) is to assess the safety and immunogenicity of a single intramuscular (IM) injection of 3 dose-levels of an Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) vaccine candidate formulated with 2 different lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) in healthy adult participants aged between 18 to 50 years, and 60 years and older. The primary objectives of this stage are to assess the safety and immunogenicity profiles across the dose-level groups (low, medium, and high doses) with 2 LNPs. This stage will evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a booster vaccination administered 12 months after the primary vaccination in a subset of the study population. Brief Summary of Stage 2: The study also also incorporates a Stage 2 (Phase IIa, dose-ranging design) that includes adults aged 60 years and older to assess the safety and immunogenicity of different doses of RSV vaccine encapsulated in one of the LNPs. In the Phase IIa dose-ranging stage, eligible participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a single IM administration of RSV vaccine candidate doses, or placebo. Multiple safety analyses will be performed, minimally at D07 and D28. Additional analyses may be performed as data are available. Read Less

This is a Phase 3, randomized, observer-blinded study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a single dose of a quadrivalent influenza modRNA vaccine compared to licensed inactivated influenza vaccine in healthy adults 18 years of age and older. Read Less

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, reactogenicity and immune responses of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA-CR-04 vaccine construct when administered in healthy adults previously vaccinated with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. Read Less

This is a Phase I, first-in-human, randomized, modified double-blind, active-controlled, dose-escalation study to assess the safety and immunogenicity of up to 3 dose levels of mRNA NA vaccines, administered as a single IM injection in healthy adults aged 18 years and older. Two age groups, 18 to 64 years and ≥65 years, will be included in this study. Read Less

This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) vaccine (V160) administered in a 2-dose or 3-dose regimen to healthy seronegative women 16 to 35 years of age. Participants received blinded V160 on Day 1, Month 2, and Month 6 (3-dose regimen), V160 on Day 1 and Month 6 and placebo at Month 2 (2-dose regimen), or placebo on Day 1, Month 2, and Month 6, and were followed to approximately Month 24. The primary hypothesis of the study was that administration of a 3-dose regimen of V160 will reduce the incidence of primary CMV infection compared to placebo. Read Less

Primary Objective: To demonstrate sufficiency of the vaccine seroresponse to meningococcal serogroups A, C, W, and Y following administration of a single dose of Meningococcal Polysaccharide (Serogroups A, C, Y, and W 135) Tetanus Toxoid (MenACYW) Conjugate vaccine to Group 1 participants (who received primary vaccination with Menomune vaccine greater than or equal to \[\>= 3\] years earlier at \>= 56 years of age in Study MET49). Secondary Objectives: Secondary Objective 1 - To demonstrate sufficiency of the vaccine seroresponse to meningococcal serogroups A, C, W, and Y following administration of a single dose of MenACYW Conjugate vaccine to Group 2 participants (who received primary vaccination with MenACYW Conjugate vaccine \>= 3 years earlier at \>= 56 years of age in Study MET49). Secondary Objective 2 - To describe vaccine seroresponse rates with respect to serogroups A, C, W, and Y in serum specimens collected 6 days (window, 5-7) post-vaccination in approximately 60 participants from Group 1 (Menomune-primed) and approximately 60 participants from Group 2 (MenACYW Conjugate vaccine-primed). Secondary Objective 3 - To describe antibody persistence \>= 3 years after primary vaccination with Menomune vaccine or MenACYW Conjugate vaccine for participants from all groups. Read Less

A total of 18,000 eligible subjects (or 6,000 subject distributed evenly between the 3 study arms) will be enrolled. Eligible subjects will be randomized in 1:1:1 (cell-culture-based vaccine, the recombinant vaccine, or the egg-based vaccine) over four influenza seasons (2018-2019, 2019-2020, 2020-2021, and 2021-2022). Read Less