Chicago, IL Paid Clinical Trials

The purpose of this study is to learn the best approach to treating patients with known or suspected Barrett's esophagus by comparing endoscopic surveillance to endoscopic eradication therapy. To diagnose and manage Barrett's esophagus and low-grade dysplasia, doctors commonly use procedures called endoscopic surveillance and endoscopic eradication therapy. Endoscopic surveillance is a type of procedure where a physician will run a tube with a light and a camera on the end of it down the patients throat and remove a small piece of tissue. The piece of tissue, called a biopsy, is about the size of the tip of a ball-point pen and is checked for abnormal cells and cancer cells. Endoscopic eradication therapy is a kind of surgery which is performed to destroy the precancerous cells at the bottom of the esophagus, so that healthy cells can grow in their place. It involves procedures to either remove precancerous tissue or burn it. These procedures can have side effects, so it is not certain whether risking those side effects is worth the benefit people get from the treatments. While both of these procedures are widely accepted approaches to managing the condition, there is not enough research to show if one is better than the other. Barrett's esophagus and low-grade dysplasia does not always worsen to high-grade dysplasia and/or cancer. In fact, it usually does not. So, if a patient's dysplasia is not worsening, doctors would rather not put patients at risk unnecessarily. On the other hand, endoscopic eradication therapy could possibly prevent the worsening of low-grade dysplasia into high-grade dysplasia or cancer (esophageal adenocarcinoma) in some patients. Researchers believe that the results of this study will help doctors choose the safest and most effective procedure for their patients with Barrett's esophagus and low-grade dysplasia. This is a multicenter study involving several academic, community and private hospitals around the United States. Up to 530 participants will be randomized. This study will also include a prospective observational cohort study of up to 150 Barrett's esophagus and low grade dysplasia patients who decline randomization in the randomized control trial but undergo endoscopic surveillance (Cohort 1) or endoscopic eradication therapy (Cohort 2), and are willing to provide longitudinal observational data. Read Less

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the impact of ROSE in individuals with adverse childhood experiences. The main question it aims to answer is, compared to enhanced treatment as usual, does the delivery of ROSE within a collaborative care model improve depressive symptom trajectories and prevent the development of perinatal depression. Participants will be randomized to either enhanced treatment as usual or the ROSE intervention, delivered by a care manager within a perinatal collaborative care program. They will complete self-reported surveys of their depression symptoms every 4 weeks to inform their symptom trajectories. They will also complete clinical interviews to establish any incident diagnoses of a major depressive episode. Read Less

This is a randomized, controlled, open-label trial of effect of 10% povidone iodine intranasal antisepsis on the detection of Candida auris. Read Less

A prospective outcomes study in patients with and esophageal cancer (EAC) and Barrett's esophagus (BE) associated neoplasia being evaluated for endoscopic eradication therapy (EET). Read Less

The objective of this trial is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Amulet LAA occluder compared to NOAC therapy in patients with non-valvular AF at increased risk for ischemic stroke and who are recommended for long-term NOAC therapy. The clinical investigation is a prospective, randomized, multicenter active control worldwide trial. Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio between the Amulet LAA occlusion device ("Device Group") and a commercially available NOAC medication ("Control Group"). The choice of NOAC in the Control Group will be left to study physician discretion. Read Less

This study seeks to evaluate the use of intermittent dosing as an alternative paradigm for patients with DRG stimulation in place for at least 1 year and minimum 50% pain relief in the targeted area. Patients will be prospectively randomized to one of two stimulation paradigms both of which involve intermittent dosing at 30 seconds ON and 90 seconds OFF. Group 1 will have their frequency set at 20 Hz with amplitude levels adjusted in order to remain in the therapeutic window (subthreshold stimulation). Group 2 will have their frequency set at 5 Hz with amplitude levels adjusted in order to remain in the therapeutic window (subthreshold stimulation) This study will be performed in a crossover fashion, meaning patients will be changed to the alternate dosing regimen at the 13-week time period. Patients will be seen and evaluated prior to randomization and reprogramming, and thereafter evaluated at 4, 8, and 12-weeks. At the 12-week time period, patients will begin a 1-week washout period of continuous stimulation. At the 13-week time period, patients will be evaluated, crossed over to the other study arm and thereafter evaluated at 17, 21, and 25-weeks. Read Less

Socioceconomically disadvantaged individuals typically have poor outcomes in behavioral weight loss interventions, but the reasons for this are unknown. This project will characterize the mechanisms through which adverse daily experiences and present bias -- a cognitive adaptation to harsh and unpredictable environments -- account for disparities in weight loss outcomes. Read Less

The purpose of this registry is to evaluate real world experience and outcomes of patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer (UTUC) treated with Jelmyto in the United States. Read Less

The aims of this study are to (1) identify the advance care planning deliberation process among 20 dyads of patients with advanced cancer and family caregivers and (2) conduct usability testing among 9 dyads to refine the content and design of the web-based resilience-building intervention. Read Less

Study Summary Nearly half (47%) of people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) whose kidney function is restored after kidney transplantation experience chronic pain compared to 19% of adults in the US general population. Pain is associated with comorbid fatigue, depression and anxiety, and withdrawal from usual physical and social activities; resulting in an inability to participate in and enjoy life. Severe pain can result in nonadherence to immunosuppression and treatment protocols and result in an increased risk of rejection, graft loss, and mortality. The role of symbiotic microbes (microbiota) in the gastrointestinal tract, and their functional genes (microbiome), is well established in diseases involving pain. Diet and stress play a major role in synthesis of signaling molecules critical to immunologic, metabolic, and endocrine pathways regulating chronic pain. Dietary patterns change dramatically after transplantation, as recipients move from a restricted "renal" diet to a regular diet, often resulting in increased consumption of foods high in sugars and fat. Moreover, psychological stress significantly impairs the function of the microbiome, initiating biological pathways involved in pain, leading to a disproportionate pain burden. Because the microbiome, serum metabolites, and pain are dynamic, our novel investigation will employ a prospective repeated measures design to interrogate the dynamic temporal relationships between the microbiome, metabolites associated with pathways regulating pain, transplantation factors (e.g. immunosuppression, kidney function), changing dietary patterns, and perceived stress, on pain scores before and after kidney transplantation. The investigators posit the gut microbiome, and its byproducts, may partially explain the underlying biological mechanisms of pain Interference in kidney disease. The investigators will address three aims: 1) To determine differential dynamic temporal relationships between microbial composition/functional genes and circulating serum metabolites in KTRs with pain vs no pain, 2) To determine the moderation effects of diet and perceived stress on dynamic temporal relationships between microbiome features, serum metabolites, and pain scores among KTRs, and 3) To use machine learning algorithms to identify host-microbial interactions that are causally linked to pain interference among KTRs. Because kidney function is restored, the kidney transplant model is powerful to study the longitudinal relationships between the microbiome, circulating metabolites and chronic pain in people with ESKD to develop patient-centered interventions to treat pain across the spectrum of CKD. Read Less

Floreciendo is a sexual and reproductive health workshop for Latina teens (ages 14-18 years) and their female caregivers (e.g., mothers, sisters, grandmothers). This study involves conducting a pilot optimization trial of Floreciendo using the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) framework. The feasibility of using a 2 x 2 x 2 factorial trial design and the acceptability of the intervention components of Floreciendo will be examined. Effectiveness and implementation outcomes will be explored. This work will be conducted in partnership with community-based organizations in the Chicagoland area. Read Less

A randomized study of continuing versus holding metformin during hospitalizations to internal medicine services to determine the effects on glucose control, acidosis, abdominal symptoms, length of stay, and mortality. Read Less